New Jersey will stand at a crossroads this November. With the gubernatorial race heating up, voters must ask a critical question: Can we afford to be led by another progressive Democrat bent on repeating the failed policies of the past? If Congresswoman Mikie Sherrill becomes governor, the answer, based on her record and rhetoric, is a resounding NO.
Sherrill’s platform echoes the same playbook that failed us under soon-to-be-former Governor Phil Murphy and, on a national scale, under President Obama. Big government, unchecked spending, soft-on-crime policies, and disastrous immigration leniency have already stretched our state’s resources and tested the patience of hardworking families. If Sherrill takes the reins, we risk doubling down on the very decisions that have driven residents and businesses out of New Jersey in record numbers.
Let’s talk numbers. Under Murphy, New Jersey’s state budget ballooned by over 70%—from $32.7 billion in 2017 to an outrageous $55.9 billion today. That’s a staggering $22 billion surge in spending with very little to show for it. Property taxes remain among the highest in the nation. Infrastructure still crumbles. School districts cry for more resources. And where did all that money go? Into bloated bureaucracy, handouts to favored groups, and misguided “green” experiments.
Sherrill has shown no indication that she would reverse this trend—in fact, she’s likely to accelerate it. Her congressional voting record has supported expansive federal spending, mirroring Murphy’s fiscal recklessness. A Sherrill governorship would not bring relief; it would guarantee more waste, higher taxes, and a shrinking middle class footing the bill.
But perhaps the most dangerous part of the Sherrill agenda is her stance on immigration. As the Biden administration struggles to contain a border crisis of historic proportions, New Jersey has felt the strain. Sherrill supports sanctuary state policies, free healthcare for undocumented immigrants, and pathways to citizenship with little regard for border security or vetting. These policies not only put a burden on our schools, hospitals, and law enforcement—they put legal residents last.
New Jerseyans know better. We’ve seen what happens when progressive ideology trumps practical governance. Families pay more and get less. Crime rises. Confidence in institutions erodes. And now we face the threat of another administration more concerned with pleasing D.C. special interests than protecting New Jersey communities.
This November of 2025, voters must choose leaders who will reverse the damage—not double it. Mikie Sherrill may offer a polished pitch, but the substance is all too familiar: Murphy 2.0, dressed up in a new pantsuit.
New Jersey needs less ideology and more accountability. Less spending and more saving. Less Washington and more common sense. We can’t afford another term of failed leadership under a different name. The future of New Jersey depends on it.
